Shapeshifting Justice: The SEC’s Weakest Case Yet

What is the point of a $275,000 fine? This week, crypto OG Erik Voorhees’ exchange ShapeShift settled charges with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over alleged securities law infractions. The exchange, which decentralized its ownership structure by launching a DAO that oversees operations in 2021, agreed to pay a $275,000 fine to settle the charges, neither agreeing nor denying guilt.

This is an excerpt from The Node newsletter, a daily roundup of the most pivotal crypto news on CoinDesk and beyond. You can subscribe to get the full newsletter here.

The settlement is a curious case, raising more questions than it answers — and not just because two of the five SEC Commissioners, Hester Peirce and Mark Uyeda, wrote a scathing rebuke of the outcome. Namely the settlement fails to state whether the way ShapeShift currently operates is legal, and forced a no longer operational business to register as a “dealer” (i.e. “any person engaged in the business of buying and selling securities”).

Between 2014 and 2021, ShapeShift bought cryptocurrencies and sold them to clients, making money off of the spread. While the SEC said that this “vending machine”-like business model was effectively ShapeShift trading against its clients, the commission did not “allege any harm,” Peirce and Uyeda wrote in a dissenting opinion.

“It is entirely unclear how ShapeShift was to discern that the Commission would consider crypto assets generally—and any crypto asset in particular—a security in the form of an investment contract. Even now, ten years on, it is hardly more discernible,” the dissenting commissioners write.

This is par for the course for the SEC under Chainman Gary Gensler, who has taken the view that nearly all cryptocurrencies are securities and therefore fall under its purview. Not only was the agency unspecific about which assets ShapeShift illegally listed, but it failed to explain its reasoning. “We respectfully request that the Commission show its work,” Peirce and Uyeda said.

To be fair, in the past, the SEC has stated that specific assets, including SOL, XRP, Telegram’s TON, Algorand’s ALGO and dozens and dozens of other tokens in its various lawsuits against crypto companies like Coinbase, Kraken and LBRY.

See also: Coinbase vs. the SEC…