Crypto Updates

Counters Bitget’s Claim Of Breaching 7-Day Listing Deadline

Floki Inu

Recently, the cryptocurrency community has witnessed a heated dispute between the protocol Floki Inu (FLOKI) and the crypto exchange Bitget

The controversy arose following Bitget’s listing of TokenFi (TOKEN) and subsequent accusations of market manipulation, unauthorized listing, and insufficient solvency.

Bitget Faces Allegations Of Market Manipulation

On October 27, 2023, Bitget announced the listing of TokenFi (TOKEN) in the Innovation Zone of its Spot market. Shortly after the trading service for TokenFi commenced, significant price fluctuations were observed, prompting suspicions of market manipulation. 

Concerns were further raised when it was discovered that TokenFi’s project team had contributed less than $2,000 worth of tokens to the liquidity pool of decentralized exchanges (DEXes), suggesting potential manipulation of initial liquidity.

Moreover, an investigation of the TokenFi project uncovered additional issues, including an “opaque” token economy and an unclear vesting schedule. 

In light of these findings and to safeguard their users, Bitget decided to delist TokenFi (TOKEN) and initiated a buyback plan for users who held the token on its platform.

Floki Inu, responded strongly to the exchange’s actions, alleging that Bitget had violated their agreement not to list TOKEN until seven days after its launch. 

The meme coin protocol claimed to have had conversations with “several Tier 1 exchanges” and respected parties in the cryptocurrency industry. While these exchanges had expressed interest in listing TOKEN earlier, they agreed to honor Floki Inu’s request to wait for the stipulated period. 

However, Bitget, which, according to Floki Inu, was “the smallest exchange” among those involved, allegedly announced the listing of a fake version of the TOKEN token just 12 minutes before the official launch on the blockchain.

Floki Inu further asserted that Bitget had engaged in “deceptive trading practices,” manipulating TOKEN’s volume without evidence of holding the actual tokens. 

The protocol alleges that Bitget’s initial announcement had even stated that withdrawals would open 24 hours after trading began, potentially indicating an attempt to manipulate the token’s price. However, the market response did not align with Bitget’s expectations, resulting in a significant financial loss.

The situation escalated when users began reporting difficulties in withdrawing TOKEN from…

Click Here to Read the Full Original Article at NewsBTC…